Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (latter half of the second and beginning of the third century C.E.), considered to be the redactor of the Codification of basic Jewish Oral Law; edited and arranged by R. Judah ha-Nasi c. 200 C.E. Mishnah , made a statement that started a trend of legal development resulting in the elimination of the category of normal menstruation and its replacement by the category of abnormal bleeding, ziva. His statement reflects the possible confusion in keeping track of one’s period, especially in light of the new system of pithei niddah. If this was done intentionally, the couple incurred the punishment of karet; if done unintentionally, they were obligated to bring a sin offering. Atonement by sacrifice, however, could not be made after the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Great efforts were therefore made to prevent inadvertent sins of this nature. BT Niddah 66a gives us Rabbi’s statement: “R. Joseph citing Rav Judah who had it from Rav stated: read this article Rabbi ordained at Sadot: If a woman observed a discharge on one day she must wait six days in addition to it. If she observed discharges on two days she must wait six days in addition to these. If she observed a discharge on three days she must wait seven clean days.”
Amoraim could not argument tannaitic rulings instead of tannaitic assistance however they written walls around the Torah to avoid inadvertent sins
Which report by Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi essentially got rid of every menstruating people about normal monthly period classification and you can put her or him about unpredictable updates out of zava since the majority regular symptoms last at the very least 3 days. Frequently his concern is you to given the cutting-edge clarifications needed to choose when you’re niddah whenever it’s possible to end up being a great zava, you to definitely you’ll visited get wrong having grievous outcomes. Initially the newest decree had restricted impression; it appears to be getting started regional, and may even was indeed limited to situations where question try involved additionally the local society was not sufficiently read to choose within the including products ( Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac; b. Indeed it was not a broad decree for everybody off Israel, nevertheless was the initial step in that guidance. In the first one or two advice, Rabbi’s report deals with a female exactly who may be a small zava or possibly good niddah. This woman is addressed in the 1st instance just like the a beneficial niddah, that have a great eight-day ages of impurity, as opposed to someday off impurity for the day out-of hemorrhaging, which is the signal to have a small zava. Regarding 2nd analogy the woman is treated as the good niddah and you can a zava in the event the first-day was actually when you look at the the lady ziva months (brand new eleven days ranging from monthly period attacks). In the third condition, the woman is handled while the a complete zava. The about three rulings make far more stringent updates.
Troyes, France, 1040 Rashi )
Subsequent statements by other sages make it absolutely certain that it was understood to be a general ent are from the amoraim, the sages who created the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmudim. We find a aic) “spokesman.” Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora Rav Huna in JT Berakhot (5:1, 8d): “Rav Huna said: One who sees a drop of blood like [the size of a] mustard seed sits and keeps [because of it] seven clean days. Afterwards he stood to pray.” The statement was made as an example of an undisputed law from which one could then turn to prayer. Such a law would clear one’s mind because there were no arguments about it, thereby allowing one to focus totally on prayer. Rav Huna’s statement is much more radical than the tannaitic version quoted above. According to him, all women who see uterine blood are in the category of the complete zava, regardless of the size of the blood stain and despite the normalcy of menstruation or having seen such blood only one or two days.